Week 8 · ratings through week 7 · 21 teams rated

The 5 most efficient teams in HBCU football. Not a poll.

HBCU sports, by the numbers. Every Division I HBCU football team, built from every logged play, opponent-adjusted, graded every week.

Updated Wed Oct 14, 2026 · through week 7 · Live record 0–0

NetEff · Top 5through week 7

Offensive success rate minus defensive, opponent-adjusted, in points.

Why these five

6 through 21 are within 11.7 NetEff points of each other.

  1. 1st: South Carolina St.

    MEAC · 5–2
    +10.0NetEffOn-Sched +3.3 · 1st

    Top three on both sides of the ball: 1st offense (45% success rate), 1st defense (35% allowed). Point margin agrees: 1st at +9.6 per game. Clear gap to Alabama A&M (5.1 NetEff points). 2 teams have a better record; all of them rate lower on efficiency. Losses: The Citadel (+2.1), Charleston Southern (+4.2). About where they finished last season (+7.0).

    net SR +10.0 · off 45% (1st) · def 35% (1st) · SRS +9.6 (1st)

  2. 2nd: Alabama A&M

    SWAC · 5–2
    +4.9NetEffOn-Sched +1.5 · 5th

    Top three on both sides of the ball: 2nd offense (44% success rate), 3rd defense (39% allowed). Point margin is less convinced: 3rd at +3.9 per game. Norfolk St. is 2.2 points back, close enough to flip next week. 2 teams have a better record; all of them rate lower on efficiency. Losses: Howard (−4.4), Jackson St. (+0.8). Up 10.0 points on last season (4–8, −5.1).

    net SR +4.9 · off 44% (2nd) · def 39% (3rd) · SRS +3.9 (3rd)

  3. 3rd: Norfolk St.

    MEAC · 4–3
    +2.7NetEffOn-Sched +1.6 · 4th

    No elite unit. Offense 5th (43%), defense 5th (40% allowed). Here because the whole is better than the parts. Point margin says even higher (2nd, +6.8 per game). Alcorn St. is 1.8 points back, close enough to flip next week. 6 teams have a better record; 4 rate lower on efficiency. Losses: Old Dominion (FBS), Virginia (FBS), Robert Morris (+0.6). Up 5.8 points on last season (1–11, −3.1).

    net SR +2.7 · off 43% (5th) · def 40% (5th) · SRS +6.8 (2nd)

  4. 4th: Alcorn St.

    SWAC · 4–3
    +0.9NetEffOn-Sched +1.7 · 3rd

    Carried by the offense: 3rd in the league at 44%. The defense is 13th at 43% allowed, and that is the thing that loses a big game. Point margin is less convinced: 7th at +0.1 per game. Even with Prairie View A&M on NetEff; point margin breaks the tie. 6 teams have a better record; 4 rate lower on efficiency. Losses: Southern Miss (FBS), North Alabama (+6.5), Grambling St. (−2.3). About where they finished last season (+1.8).

    net SR +0.9 · off 44% (3rd) · def 43% (13th) · SRS +0.1 (7th)

  5. 5th: Prairie View A&M

    SWAC · 2–5
    +0.9NetEffOn-Sched −0.7 · 10th

    No elite unit. Offense 11th (40%), defense 4th (39% allowed). Here because the whole is better than the parts. Point margin is less convinced: 9th at −2.8 per game. Jackson St. is 0.1 points back, close enough to flip next week. 15 teams have a better record; 11 rate lower on efficiency. Losses: Tarleton State (+8.2), Baylor (FBS), Stephen F. Austin (+4.7), Mississippi Valley St. (−6.9), Southern (−10.9). Down 3.7 points from last season (10–4, +4.6).

    net SR +0.9 · off 40% (11th) · def 39% (4th) · SRS −2.8 (9th)

The number

NetEff

Our rating, built with standard analytics methods (success rate, adjusted for strength of schedule): how often a team’s offense gets the yards it needs on a play, minus how often its defense allows the same.

A play counts when it gains 50% of the needed yards on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, and all of it on 3rd or 4th.

On-Schedule Rate is our second number: how often your offense plays from a comfortable down and distance, minus how often you let opponents do it. NetEff grades each play; On-Schedule Rate grades where each play leaves you.

Offense: plays that work40%HBCU average across 21 teamsBest: South Carolina St. 45%
Defense: opponent plays that work42%HBCU average across 21 teamsBest: South Carolina St. 35%
NetEff: the difference−1.9HBCU average across 21 teamsBest: South Carolina St. +10.0
This week · Week 8 · Saturday, Oct 17

This week

9 games involving an HBCU, each with its model pick.

  1. Bethune-Cookman#9 at Mississippi Valley St.#19
    Oct 17 · 3–3 · 3–4 · NetEff −0.5 · −6.9
    Bethune-Cookman by 10.6Model pick · locked
  2. Alabama St.#8 at Arkansas-Pine Bluff#18
    Oct 17 · 3–3 · 3–2 · NetEff −0.1 · −6.3
    Alabama St. by 2.3Model pick · locked
  3. Morgan St.#7 at Tennessee St.#11
    Oct 17 · 5–1 · 1–5 · NetEff +0.7 · −1.9Upset pick: Tennessee St.
    Morgan St. by 6.9Model pick · locked
  4. Florida A&M#20 at Jackson St.#6
    Oct 17 · 2–4 · 5–1 · NetEff −10.2 · +0.8
    Jackson St. by 13.8Model pick · locked
  5. Grambling St.#12 at Alabama A&M#2
    Oct 17 · 4–2 · 5–2 · NetEff −2.3 · +4.9
    Alabama A&M by 8.9Model pick · locked
  6. Alcorn St.#4 at Prairie View A&M#5
    Oct 17 · 4–3 · 2–5 · NetEff +0.9 · +0.9
    Alcorn St. by 0.4Model pick · locked
  7. Hampton#17 at Sacred Heart
    Oct 17 · 1–5 · – · NetEff −4.8 · +3.4
    Sacred Heart by 11.2Model pick
  8. Chicago State at NC A&T#15
    Oct 17 · – · 2–5 · NetEff −7.6 · −4.2
    NC A&T by 9.8Model pick
  9. Morehouse College at Howard#16
    Oct 17 · – · 2–4 · NetEff – · −4.4
    No line · Division II opponent

Lines are the SRS gap plus 2.5 points for the home team. Ratings now use every FCS game, not just HBCU games; D2 and FBS opponents are rated as groups.
Idle this week: Delaware St., Southern, Norfolk St., South Carolina St., Texas Southern, NC Central.

Upset of the week

Tennessee State over Morgan State.

Morgan State is 5–1 but rates 7th in NetEff at +0.7, about an average team's efficiency. Their last two wins were by 3 over Villanova and by 1 over Robert Morris, and their one blowout was 55–0 over Virginia Lynchburg, which isn't Division I. Tennessee State is 1–5 but took Jackson State to the final possession (24–26) and won at Florida A&M (29–26). Only 2.6 NetEff points separate them, and the model has Morgan by 7 with TSU at home. The case against: Alabama A&M beat TSU 30–3, and TSU's offense ranks 13th. Morgan's defense also ranks 13th, so this comes down to which weak unit gets exposed.

  • Morgan State: NetEff +0.7 (7th), offense 44% (4th), defense 43% allowed (13th), SRS +1.9
  • Tennessee State: NetEff −1.9 (11th), offense 40% (13th), defense 42% allowed (10th), SRS −7.5
  • Model line: Morgan State by 6.9 (SRS gap 9.4, minus 2.5 home field for TSU)
Track record

Graded every week

Lines are locked before kickoff and scored after the final. The record stays public, good weeks and bad.

Live record · 2026 · straight up
0–0

Starts with this week’s games. Lines are locked before kickoff and scored here on Sunday.

Live

Lines locked before kickoff
  1. Bethune-Cookman at Mississippi Valley St.Oct 17 · locked line Bethune-Cookman by 10.6Pending
  2. Alabama St. at Arkansas-Pine BluffOct 17 · locked line Alabama St. by 2.3Pending
  3. Morgan St. at Tennessee St.Oct 17 · locked line Morgan St. by 6.9 · upset pick Tennessee St.Pending
  4. Florida A&M at Jackson St.Oct 17 · locked line Jackson St. by 13.8Pending
  5. Grambling St. at Alabama A&MOct 17 · locked line Alabama A&M by 8.9Pending
  6. Alcorn St. at Prairie View A&MOct 17 · locked line Alcorn St. by 0.4Pending

Lines rerun on games already played

In-sample · 17–12

Hit, off by 3.4 reads like a down-and-distance box: the call, and how many points the line missed the final margin by.

Applying the current ratings to the 29 HBCU-vs-HBCU games already played picks the winner in 17 of 29 (59%) and misses the margin by 9.6 points on average. The backtest is in-sample, meaning the ratings already know these results, so it shows fit, not prediction. The live record is the one that counts.

  1. Mississippi Valley St. at Texas SouthernOct 10 · line Texas Southern by 9.6 · Mississippi Valley St. by 4Miss, off by 13.6
  2. Southern at Prairie View A&MOct 10 · line Prairie View A&M by 11.5 · Southern by 14Miss, off by 25.5
  3. Jackson St. at Grambling St.Oct 10 · line Jackson St. by 1.6 · Grambling St. by 7Miss, off by 8.6
  4. Bethune-Cookman at Alabama A&MOct 10 · line Alabama A&M by 9.5 · Alabama A&M by 38Hit, off by 28.5
  5. Florida A&M at Alabama St.Oct 9 · line Alabama St. by 13.3 · Florida A&M by 1Miss, off by 14.3
  6. Prairie View A&M at Mississippi Valley St.Oct 3 · line Prairie View A&M by 10.9 · Mississippi Valley St. by 1Miss, off by 11.9
  7. Arkansas-Pine Bluff at SouthernOct 3 · line Arkansas-Pine Bluff by 5.6 · Arkansas-Pine Bluff by 31Hit, off by 25.4
  8. Alabama St. at Bethune-CookmanOct 3 · line Alabama St. by 1.7 · Bethune-Cookman by 6Miss, off by 7.7
Movers · NetEff vs last season

Who moved

The three biggest risers and fallers in NetEff since 2025, each bar in school colors.

Biggest risersAAMU4–8 (−5.1) → 5–2 (+4.9)+10.0MORG4–8 (−5.8) → 5–1 (+0.7)+6.5NSU1–11 (−3.1) → 4–3 (+2.7)+5.8Biggest fallersNCCU8–4 (+5.6) → 2–5 (−3.5)−9.1SU2–10 (−3.8) → 3–4 (−10.9)−7.1JSU9–3 (+6.1) → 5–1 (+0.8)−5.3

Change in NetEff points, 2025 to 2026. Records and ratings show 2025 → 2026. The chain sticks stand 10 points either side of zero.

All 21 teams by NetEff · 2026

NetEff = offensive success rate minus defensive success rate allowed, both adjusted for opponent strength, shown in percentage points. A successful play gains 50% of needed yards on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th. SRS = point margin per game adjusted for schedule.

All 21 teams by NetEff, 2026
MEAC5–2+10.0+7.0+3.0+3.345%35%6.45.4+1.0+9.6+24.4
SWAC5–2+4.9−5.1+10.0+1.544%39%6.65.1+1.4+3.9+18.7
MEAC4–3+2.7−3.1+5.8+1.643%40%6.15.5+0.6+6.8+11.9
SWAC4–3+0.9+1.8−0.9+1.744%43%6.06.1−0.1+0.1+6.0
SWAC2–5+0.9+4.6−3.7−0.740%39%5.55.3+0.2−2.8−7.3
SWAC5–1+0.8+6.1−5.3+0.743%42%6.45.6+0.8+1.6+17.0
MEAC5–1+0.7−5.8+6.5+2.544%43%6.86.3+0.4+1.9+3.5
SWAC3–3−0.1+1.8−1.9+0.139%39%5.26.0−0.8+1.1+8.2
SWAC3–3−0.5−4.5+4.0−0.842%42%5.46.4−0.9−3.1−4.2
SWAC1–5−1.5−4.0+2.5−0.142%43%6.16.4−0.3−9.1−21.7
OVC1–5−1.9−6.1+4.2+0.240%42%5.56.5−1.0−7.5−17.8
SWAC4–2−2.3−5.3+3.0−1.742%45%6.46.7−0.3−2.5+2.0
MEAC2–5−3.5+5.6−9.1−2.538%41%5.36.1−0.7−5.6−7.1
MEAC4–3−3.7−1.4−2.3−5.740%43%5.75.7+0.1−4.3−1.9
CAA2–5−4.2−7.5+3.3−4.039%43%5.76.2−0.5−5.0−12.7
MEAC2–4−4.4−1.8−2.6−0.937%42%5.36.0−0.6−3.6−16.0
CAA1–5−4.8−6.6+1.8−4.940%45%5.46.0−0.6−10.1−17.3
SWAC3–2−6.3−9.6+3.3−4.040%47%6.66.4+0.2−3.7+3.0
SWAC3–4−6.9−12.5+5.6−6.434%41%5.15.7−0.7−16.2−15.9
SWAC2–4−10.2−5.0−5.2−8.236%46%5.76.5−0.8−9.7−16.0
SWAC3–4−10.9−3.8−7.1−3.936%47%5.36.8−1.5−11.8−11.6

Click a column header to sort; click again to flip. Click a 2026 team to open its opponent report. Earlier seasons are ratings only, and On-Sched is 2026 only.

Teams · opponent report

Scout any team

Pick a team for its opponent report: where it gets beat, how to attack it, and the numbers behind each call.

Read it as a
SWAC · 12
MEAC · 6
CAA · 2
OVC · 1
Opponent report · MEAC · 2026

South Carolina St.

Record
5–2
NetEff · 1st
+10.0
  1. W 87–0vs Savannah StateAug 29 · D2
  2. W 66–0vs Virginia StateSep 12 · D2
  3. W 20–17at FurmanSep 19 · FCS · NetEff −1.9
  4. L 31–34vs The CitadelOct 3 · FCS · NetEff +2.1
  5. L 39–49at Charleston SouthernOct 10 · FCS · NetEff +4.2
Members only

The full South Carolina St. report

The game plan against South Carolina St. on both sides of the ball, their pass chart and run game, how they finish drives, field zones, and the quarterback, receiver, ball carrier and defensive tables. Updated every week.

Join

Join On Schedule

Members get the scouting side of the site. The Top 5, this week’s lines, the track record and the ratings stay free for everyone.

  • The full opponent report for all 21 teams, updated every week
  • The game plan on both sides of the ball: how to stop their offense, how to attack their defense
  • Pass charts, run direction, run game and finishing, field zones
  • Quarterback, receiver, ball carrier and defensive leader tables

Checking your account…

About the numbers

See one raw game feed

Where the data comes from. At every college football game, the home team’s stat crew sits in the press box and types in every play as it happens: down, distance, who ran or threw, where the ball went, who made the tackle. That’s the official record the NCAA uses. The schools and conferences send it out, and ESPN publishes the full play log for every game at a public web address that anyone can open in a browser. We read every one of those plays. Nothing here is behind a login, scraped from a paid service, or guessed.

See it yourself. This is the raw feed for Alabama State at Southern on Aug 29, exactly as we receive it: ESPN game summary 401868324. Search the page for “pass complete short right” and you’ll see the sentence a stat crew typed that becomes one square of a pass chart.

What we add. ESPN shows you the box score. We compute what isn’t in a box score: whether each play kept the drive on schedule (success rate), where the ball goes (pass chart and run direction), what a team does on 3rd and short or in the red zone, how often the quarterback is under pressure, and an opponent-adjusted rating that compares every team on the same scale regardless of who they played. Player totals (yards, catches, tackles) are ESPN’s own box score numbers; targets and direction splits are ours, because nobody else tracks them.

What we can’t see. The crew logs what happened, not what the defense was in. Coverage, personnel groupings, motion and blitzes aren’t in the text. That takes film. We also depend on each school’s crew: some log “pass complete short right,” some log “pass complete.” When a team’s chart looks thin, that’s usually why.

The rating. Net Efficiency (NetEff) is offensive success rate minus defensive success rate allowed, adjusted for opponent strength by running the numbers through every game an HBCU team played until each team’s rating accounts for who it played. To measure opponents properly, we rate every FCS game each week, about 500 this season, so a non-HBCU FCS opponent is judged on its whole schedule. FBS opponents are rated together as one group, and Division II opponents as another, because we see each of them only once or twice; as groups, D2 opponents rate about 19 points below average and FBS opponents about 22 above. The result is a comparison among the 21 HBCU teams, shown in percentage points. It’s not a poll, and it says nothing about how an HBCU team compares to Georgia. A team moves only when its numbers move.

On-Schedule Rate. Our second number. A snap is on schedule if it’s any 1st down, 2nd and 6 or less, or 3rd or 4th and 3 or less. On-Schedule Rate is the share of a team’s offensive snaps that are on schedule, minus the same share for its opponents, opponent-adjusted the same way as NetEff. The idea builds on Bill Connelly’s standard downs and passing downs. It tracks NetEff closely (a correlation of 0.85 across the 21 teams this season), and where the two disagree is usually the story.

What counts. Every game an HBCU team played this season is in the model. Non-HBCU FCS opponents like Furman or Campbell are rated on their full schedules, because we rate every FCS game, not just HBCU games. FBS opponents are rated as one group and Division II opponents as another, since we only see each of those teams once or twice: an 87-0 win over a D2 team counts as beating a team well below average, and a loss at an SEC school counts as losing to a team well above it. NetEff ranks only the 21 HBCU teams.

Coverage this season. Every rush and pass logged by the home stat crew for all 106 completed games this season involving a Division I HBCU (13,361 plays), pulled from ESPN’s public game feeds. Direction, depth, target, pressure and tackler come from the play text itself, so completeness depends on each school’s crew. 93% of plays carry a direction. Ratings use three seasons and are adjusted within the pool of HBCU games, so NC A&T, Hampton and Tennessee State are rated on their games against this pool and their shared non-conference opponents. Plays with no down logged are excluded. Not affiliated with ESPN, the SWAC, the MEAC or any school. On Schedule · onschedulehbcu.com

Pass chart depth and direction are as logged. “Short” and “deep” follow the crew’s call, roughly under and over 15 air yards. Havoc = tackles for loss, sacks, interceptions and fumbles lost per play.

Share cards

Post these

Square cards for social, 1080 by 1080. Download, or screenshot and long-press to save.

On Scheduleweek 7

5 most efficient teams

  1. 1South Carolina St.MEAC · 5–2+10.0
  2. 2Alabama A&MSWAC · 5–2+4.9
  3. 3Norfolk St.MEAC · 4–3+2.7
  4. 4Alcorn St.SWAC · 4–3+0.9
  5. 5Prairie View A&MSWAC · 2–5+0.9

NetEff, opponent-adjusted. Not a poll. · onschedulehbcu.com

On Schedule · Upset of the week

Tennessee State over Morgan State.

Morgan State is 5–1 but rates 7th in NetEff, an average team's efficiency. Their last two wins were by 3 and by 1. Tennessee State is 1–5 but lost to Jackson State by 2 and won at Florida A&M. Model says Morgan by 7. We say the record is lying.

Week 8 · Saturday, Oct 17 · Model line: Morgan State by 6.9 (SRS gap 9.4, minus 2.5 home field for TSU) · onschedulehbcu.com